Filed: May 24, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6432 DEXTER O. JOHNSON, a/k/a Salih Abdul Alhalim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LT. BEAMON; SGT. MASSENBERG; CPL. PARKER; CAPT. MASKELONY, Director of Security; CAPT. PARHAM, Director of Treatment, LT. LEWIS; LT. SCOTT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00280-JBF-TEM) Submitted: May 19, 2011
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-6432 DEXTER O. JOHNSON, a/k/a Salih Abdul Alhalim, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. LT. BEAMON; SGT. MASSENBERG; CPL. PARKER; CAPT. MASKELONY, Director of Security; CAPT. PARHAM, Director of Treatment, LT. LEWIS; LT. SCOTT, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior District Judge. (2:09-cv-00280-JBF-TEM) Submitted: May 19, 2011 D..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 11-6432
DEXTER O. JOHNSON, a/k/a Salih Abdul Alhalim,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LT. BEAMON; SGT. MASSENBERG; CPL. PARKER; CAPT. MASKELONY,
Director of Security; CAPT. PARHAM, Director of Treatment,
LT. LEWIS; LT. SCOTT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, Senior
District Judge. (2:09-cv-00280-JBF-TEM)
Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dexter O. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER &
COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dexter O. Johnson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Johnson v. Beamon, No. 2:09-cv-00280-JBF-TEM (E.D. Va.
Mar. 8, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2