SMITH v. MABUS, 10-2429. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110510127
Visitors: 10
Filed: May 10, 2011
Latest Update: May 10, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus , No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral arg
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus , No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argu..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bruce E. Smith appeals the district court's order dismissing his complaint for nonpayment of filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Mabus, No. 2:10-cv-00502-RAJ-TEM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 19; entered Oct. 20, 2010 & Nov. 24, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
