U.S. v. SHIKANDA, 11-7085. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111223089
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 23, 2011
Latest Update: Dec. 23, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paramena J. Shikanda appeals the district court's order denying his self-styled motion for sentence adjustment and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shikanda's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's order. United States v. Shikanda , No. 2:09-cr-00251-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with or
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Paramena J. Shikanda appeals the district court's order denying his self-styled motion for sentence adjustment and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shikanda's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's order. United States v. Shikanda , No. 2:09-cr-00251-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with ora..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Paramena J. Shikanda appeals the district court's order denying his self-styled motion for sentence adjustment and has filed a motion for appointment of counsel. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Shikanda's motion for appointment of counsel and affirm the district court's order. United States v. Shikanda, No. 2:09-cr-00251-3 (S.D.W. Va. July 11, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
