Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Alexander Saenz-Lagos v. Eric Holder, Jr., 11-1944 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 11-1944 Visitors: 10
Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1944 ALEXANDER MOISES SAENZ-LAGOS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hudaidah F. Bhimdi, FAYAD LAW P.C., Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney G
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-1944 ALEXANDER MOISES SAENZ-LAGOS, Petitioner, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General, Respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 26, 2012 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Hudaidah F. Bhimdi, FAYAD LAW P.C., Falls Church, Virginia, for Petitioner. Tony West, Assistant Attorney General, Ada E. Bosque, Senior Litigation Counsel, Jonathan Robbins, Trial Attorney, Washington, D.C., for Respondent. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Alexander Moises Saenz-Lagos, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”) denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have reviewed the record and Saenz- Lagos’s contentions on appeal and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on his motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2012). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Saenz-Lagos (B.I.A. Aug. 5, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer