Filed: Apr. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7414 DAVID BRYANT WICKS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; TIMOTHY R. FALOON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01570-RDB) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bryant Wicks, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7414 DAVID BRYANT WICKS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; TIMOTHY R. FALOON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01570-RDB) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bryant Wicks, Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 11-7414 DAVID BRYANT WICKS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. BRENDA SHELL-ELEAZER; TIMOTHY R. FALOON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:11-cv-01570-RDB) Submitted: April 19, 2012 Decided: April 25, 2012 Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Bryant Wicks, Appellant Pro Se. Hamilton F. Tyler, ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY OFFICE OF LAW, Annapolis, Maryland; Philip Melton Andrews, Jeremy C.B. Wyatt, KRAMON & GRAHAM, PA, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David Bryant Wicks appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Wicks v. Shell-Eleazer, No. 1:11-cv-01570-RDB (D. Md. Sept. 22, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
