Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Irma Williams v. David Sabo, 12-1689 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1689 Visitors: 34
Filed: Nov. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1689 IRMA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID SABO; CYNTHIA BREYFOGLE; MARYANN CURL; CAROLE RIVERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH) Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1689 IRMA WILLIAMS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVID SABO; CYNTHIA BREYFOGLE; MARYANN CURL; CAROLE RIVERS; UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH) Submitted: November 2, 2012 Decided: November 7, 2012 Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. George W. Saenger, ADAMS, HENDON, CARSON, CROW & SAENGER, PA, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellant. Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Irma Williams appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to substitute the United States as the party Defendant and dismissing her civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. Sabo, No. 1:11-cv-00219-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Apr. 25, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer