Filed: Jun. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6280 DWAYNE DELESTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN MILDRED RIVERA, Federal Correctional Institution Estill; CARLTON, Federal Correctional Institution Estill Camp Administrator; LIEUTENANT YATES; LIEUTENANT BOWEN; LIEUTENANT VINCENT; LIEUTENANT BUCKLER; CHIEF OF SECURITY CAPTAIN NORM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, D
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6280 DWAYNE DELESTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. WARDEN MILDRED RIVERA, Federal Correctional Institution Estill; CARLTON, Federal Correctional Institution Estill Camp Administrator; LIEUTENANT YATES; LIEUTENANT BOWEN; LIEUTENANT VINCENT; LIEUTENANT BUCKLER; CHIEF OF SECURITY CAPTAIN NORM, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, Di..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6280
DWAYNE DELESTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
WARDEN MILDRED RIVERA, Federal Correctional Institution
Estill; CARLTON, Federal Correctional Institution Estill
Camp Administrator; LIEUTENANT YATES; LIEUTENANT BOWEN;
LIEUTENANT VINCENT; LIEUTENANT BUCKLER; CHIEF OF SECURITY
CAPTAIN NORM,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. David C. Norton, District Judge.
(6:11-cv-02968-DCN)
Submitted: May 31, 2012 Decided: June 6, 2012
Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dwayne Deleston, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Dwayne Deleston appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388
(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Deleston v. Rivera, No. 6:11-cv-02968-DCN
(D.S.C. Jan. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2