Filed: Aug. 22, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6717 ERIC WISE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. K. M. WHITE; PATRICIA STANSBERRY; ALVIN EVANS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN WALTON; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ENGEL; KEVIN KIDDY; JAMES CUFFEE; OFFICER FLEMMINGS; OFFICER PURDIE; UNKNOWN OFFICER ONE; S.I.S. AGENT K. VAUGHAN, Defendants - Appellees, and RECREATION SPECIALIST A. GRAVES; LIEUTENANT RICHARDSON; LIEUTENANT LESLIE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distr
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6717 ERIC WISE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. K. M. WHITE; PATRICIA STANSBERRY; ALVIN EVANS; ASSOCIATE WARDEN WALTON; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ENGEL; KEVIN KIDDY; JAMES CUFFEE; OFFICER FLEMMINGS; OFFICER PURDIE; UNKNOWN OFFICER ONE; S.I.S. AGENT K. VAUGHAN, Defendants - Appellees, and RECREATION SPECIALIST A. GRAVES; LIEUTENANT RICHARDSON; LIEUTENANT LESLIE, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern Distri..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-6717
ERIC WISE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
K. M. WHITE; PATRICIA STANSBERRY; ALVIN EVANS; ASSOCIATE
WARDEN WALTON; ASSOCIATE WARDEN ENGEL; KEVIN KIDDY; JAMES
CUFFEE; OFFICER FLEMMINGS; OFFICER PURDIE; UNKNOWN OFFICER
ONE; S.I.S. AGENT K. VAUGHAN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
RECREATION SPECIALIST A. GRAVES; LIEUTENANT RICHARDSON;
LIEUTENANT LESLIE,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief
District Judge. (2:09-cv-00351-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: August 2, 2012 Decided: August 22, 2012
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eric Wise, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Anthony Exley, Assistant
United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Eric Wise appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown
Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971).
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Wise v. White, No. 2:09-cv-00351-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va. Feb.
24, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3