Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

John Fishback v. Bobby Shearin, 12-6834 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-6834 Visitors: 45
Filed: Nov. 08, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6834 JOHN W. FISHBACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Asst. Warden; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, FORMER EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND FORMER CONTRACTORS OF THE NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN A. ROWLEY, Defendant. No. 12-7137 JOHN W. FISHBACK, Pla
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-6834 JOHN W. FISHBACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Asst. Warden; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, FORMER EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND FORMER CONTRACTORS OF THE NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN A. ROWLEY, Defendant. No. 12-7137 JOHN W. FISHBACK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. BOBBY P. SHEARIN, Warden; RICHARD J. GRAHAM, JR., Asst. Warden; GARY D. MAYNARD, Secretary of Public Safety and Correctional Services; UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, FORMER EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND FORMER CONTRACTORS OF THE NORTH BRANCH CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AND ROXBURY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Defendants – Appellees, and JOHN A. ROWLEY, Defendant. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:11-cv-00612-JFM) Submitted: October 25, 2012 Decided: November 8, 2012 Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John W. Fishback, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane- Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 PER CURIAM: John W. Fishback appeals the district court’s orders denying his motions and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Fishback v. Shearin, No. 1:11-cv- 00612-JFM (D. Md. June 15, 2012; Apr. 3, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer