Filed: Aug. 21, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7092 ADAM C. PUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. EVANS, Captain; JEFF WILLIAMS, Sergeant; MS. LINDA, Nurse; OFFICER SULLIVAN; OFFICER HICKMAN; OFFICER BOHEMER; OFFICER CAISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03239-D) Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012 Before KING a
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7092 ADAM C. PUGH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. EVANS, Captain; JEFF WILLIAMS, Sergeant; MS. LINDA, Nurse; OFFICER SULLIVAN; OFFICER HICKMAN; OFFICER BOHEMER; OFFICER CAISON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III, Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03239-D) Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012 Before KING an..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7092
ADAM C. PUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. EVANS, Captain; JEFF WILLIAMS, Sergeant; MS. LINDA,
Nurse; OFFICER SULLIVAN; OFFICER HICKMAN; OFFICER BOHEMER;
OFFICER CAISON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
Chief District Judge. (5:11-ct-03239-D)
Submitted: August 16, 2012 Decided: August 21, 2012
Before KING and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adam C. Pugh, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Adam C. Pugh appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Pugh v. Evans, No. 5:11-ct-03239-D (E.D.N.C. June 20,
2012). We deny Pugh’s motion for appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2