Filed: Dec. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7712 DANIEL MCRAE, Federal Detainee, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONMED, Charles City Detention Center, Defendant – Appellee, and NANCY SIDOROWICZ, a/k/a Nancy, P.A., Nurse, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:12-cv-01347-AW) Submitted: November 28, 2012 Decided: December 12, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit J
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7712 DANIEL MCRAE, Federal Detainee, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CONMED, Charles City Detention Center, Defendant – Appellee, and NANCY SIDOROWICZ, a/k/a Nancy, P.A., Nurse, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (8:12-cv-01347-AW) Submitted: November 28, 2012 Decided: December 12, 2012 Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Ju..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7712
DANIEL MCRAE, Federal Detainee,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONMED, Charles City Detention Center,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
NANCY SIDOROWICZ, a/k/a Nancy, P.A., Nurse,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01347-AW)
Submitted: November 28, 2012 Decided: December 12, 2012
Before MOTZ, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Daniel McRae, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Althauser, ECCLESTON &
WOLF, PC, Hanover, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Daniel McRae seeks to appeal the district court’s
order granting Appellee’s motion to dismiss the claims against
Appellee. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P.
54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-
46 (1949). The order McRae seeks to appeal is neither a final
order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
Accordingly, we grant Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal
for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2