Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Resa McCrae v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp., 12-1906 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-1906 Visitors: 18
Filed: Jan. 11, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1906 RESA MCCRAE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE CORP., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge. (1:11-cv-01368-BPG) Submitted: December 26, 2012 Decided: January 11, 2013 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Ledyard-Marks, LAW OFFICE OF BARRY
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-1906 RESA MCCRAE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SHOPPERS FOOD WAREHOUSE CORP., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Beth P. Gesner, Magistrate Judge. (1:11-cv-01368-BPG) Submitted: December 26, 2012 Decided: January 11, 2013 Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Ledyard-Marks, LAW OFFICE OF BARRY R. GLAZER, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Mark A. Kohl, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS, LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Resa McCrae appeals the magistrate judge’s order ∗ granting summary judgment in favor of Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp. ("Shoppers"), in her civil action alleging negligence. McCrae argues that there is a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether a dangerous condition existed on Shoppers’ premises, whether Shoppers created the dangerous condition, and whether Shoppers had constructive knowledge of the dangerous condition. Our review of the record and the briefs filed by the parties discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. McCrae v. Shoppers Food Warehouse Corp., No. 1:11-cv-01368-BPG (D. Md. June 27, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ With the consent of the parties, the magistrate judge exercised jurisdiction over this litigation, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1) (2006). 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer