Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ellis Barber v. President Obama, 12-2314 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2314 Visitors: 28
Filed: Jan. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2314 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, American Indian Ministries a/k/a Jesus Christ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA; DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., Solicitor General; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. Attorney General, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02614-RDB) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 2
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2314 ELLIS HARLEY BARBER, American Indian Ministries a/k/a Jesus Christ, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA; DONALD B. VERRILLI, JR., Solicitor General; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. Attorney General, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-02614-RDB) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ellis Harley Barber, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ellis Harley Barber seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for failure to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2). On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Barber does not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer