Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

David Corbin v. Chief Justice Lynn Johnson, 12-2414 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 12-2414 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 29, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2414 DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHIEF JUSTICE LYNN JOHNSON; CHIEF JUSTICE ELIZABETH KEEVER; JUDGE KIMBERLY TUCKER; JUDGE ABRAHAM JONES; DAWN DRIGGERS; ELLEN HANCOCK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00456-FL) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013 Before AGEE and
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2414 DAVID R. CORBIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. CHIEF JUSTICE LYNN JOHNSON; CHIEF JUSTICE ELIZABETH KEEVER; JUDGE KIMBERLY TUCKER; JUDGE ABRAHAM JONES; DAWN DRIGGERS; ELLEN HANCOCK, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00456-FL) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: April 29, 2013 Before AGEE and WYNN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David R. Corbin, Appellant Pro Se. Grady L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina; Jose A. Coker, THE CHARLESTON GROUP, Fayetteville, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David R. Corbin appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Corbin v. Johnson, No. 5:11-cv-00456-FL (E.D.N.C. Aug. 10, 2012). We deny Corbin’s motions to show cause and to mediate, and we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer