Filed: May 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2435 MOLLI TRISH CABRERA; DARLENE ELIZABETH CARTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DONTA CORNELIUS BROWN; WESTERN EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:12-cv-00041-SAG) Submitted: April 29, 2013 Decided: May 2, 2013 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2435 MOLLI TRISH CABRERA; DARLENE ELIZABETH CARTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DONTA CORNELIUS BROWN; WESTERN EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:12-cv-00041-SAG) Submitted: April 29, 2013 Decided: May 2, 2013 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2435 MOLLI TRISH CABRERA; DARLENE ELIZABETH CARTER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. DONTA CORNELIUS BROWN; WESTERN EXPRESS, INCORPORATED, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Stephanie A. Gallagher, Magistrate Judge. (1:12-cv-00041-SAG) Submitted: April 29, 2013 Decided: May 2, 2013 Before KING, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Solomon M. Sterenberg, STEIN SPERLING BENNETT DEJONG DRISCOLL, PC, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellants. Charles B. Peoples, THOMAS, THOMAS & HAFER, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Molli Trish Cabrera and Darlene Elizabeth Carter (“Appellants”) appeal the magistrate judge’s sanctions order and the order granting summary judgment in favor of Donta Cornelius Brown and Western Express, Incorporated in Appellants’ civil action. ∗ We have reviewed the parties briefs and the joint appendix and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Cabrera v. Brown, No. 1:12-cv-00041-SAG (D. Md. Aug. 28 & Sept. 17, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ The parties consented to the exercise of jurisdiction by the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2006). 2