Filed: Jan. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7548 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JERRY LEE JENKINS, a/k/a Jason Shane Jenkins, a/k/a Shane Jenkins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:98-cr-00013-JDP-1) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirm
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7548 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JERRY LEE JENKINS, a/k/a Jason Shane Jenkins, a/k/a Shane Jenkins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:98-cr-00013-JDP-1) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirme..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7548 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. JERRY LEE JENKINS, a/k/a Jason Shane Jenkins, a/k/a Shane Jenkins, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:98-cr-00013-JDP-1) Submitted: January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jerry Lee Jenkins, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Jerry Lee Jenkins appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a show cause hearing and for transport. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jenkins, No. 3:98-cr-00013-JDP-1 (N.D.W. Va. July 30, 2012; Aug. 29, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
