Filed: Apr. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8149 BOBBY R. KNOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARTHUR DAVIS, Doctor; MS. COLDSMITH, Supervisor of Nurses; MS. SIMMONS, Head Nurse; SUSAN COLLIER, Administrative Programs; KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; MS. L. GALLAWAY, Nurse Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03266-F) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Deci
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8149 BOBBY R. KNOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARTHUR DAVIS, Doctor; MS. COLDSMITH, Supervisor of Nurses; MS. SIMMONS, Head Nurse; SUSAN COLLIER, Administrative Programs; KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; MS. L. GALLAWAY, Nurse Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03266-F) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decid..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-8149 BOBBY R. KNOX, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARTHUR DAVIS, Doctor; MS. COLDSMITH, Supervisor of Nurses; MS. SIMMONS, Head Nurse; SUSAN COLLIER, Administrative Programs; KEITH A. KUHNE, Doctor; MS. L. GALLAWAY, Nurse Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:11-ct-03266-F) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 2, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bobby R. Knox, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Bobby R. Knox appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Knox v. Davis, No. 5:11-ct-03266-F (E.D.N.C. Dec. 13, 2012). We deny Knox’s motions for a protective order/injunctive relief and his motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
