JEFFRIES v. GAYLORD ENTERTAINMENT, 13-1554. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20130826136
Visitors: 6
Filed: Aug. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Aug. 26, 2013
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Monica Jeffries appeals from the district court's judgment in Defendants' favor on her disability discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. 12101 to 12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Jeffries v. Gaylord Entm't, Nos
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Monica Jeffries appeals from the district court's judgment in Defendants' favor on her disability discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. 12101 to 12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Jeffries v. Gaylord Entm't, Nos...
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Monica Jeffries appeals from the district court's judgment in Defendants' favor on her disability discrimination and retaliation claims, brought pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 12101 to 12213 (West 2005 & Supp. 2013). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment. See Jeffries v. Gaylord Entm't, Nos. 8:10-cv-00691-PJM, 8:10-cv-02418-PJM (D. Md. Mar. 27, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
