BROOKS v. LIPTROT, 13-7442. (2013)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20131224057
Visitors: 1
Filed: Dec. 24, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 24, 2013
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Curtis Ray Brooks appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Liptrot, No. 1:12-cv-01405-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 21, 2013; entered Aug. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequat
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Curtis Ray Brooks appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Liptrot, No. 1:12-cv-01405-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 21, 2013; entered Aug. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequate..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Curtis Ray Brooks appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brooks v. Liptrot, No. 1:12-cv-01405-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. filed Aug. 21, 2013; entered Aug. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
