Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Ralph Hayes v. Lynchburg City School Board, 14-1328 (2014)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 14-1328 Visitors: 42
Filed: Sep. 29, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1328 RALPH L. HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOL BOARD, as constituted by Mary Ann H. Barker, Dr. Regina T. Dolan-Sewell, Charlie White, Jenny Poore, J. Marie Walker, Thomas H. Webb, Albert Billingsly, Katie Snydor, and Treney Tweedy, Members of the School Board, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior D
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1328 RALPH L. HAYES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOL BOARD, as constituted by Mary Ann H. Barker, Dr. Regina T. Dolan-Sewell, Charlie White, Jenny Poore, J. Marie Walker, Thomas H. Webb, Albert Billingsly, Katie Snydor, and Treney Tweedy, Members of the School Board, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, Senior District Judge. (6:13-cv-00008-NKM-RSB) Submitted: September 25, 2014 Decided: September 29, 2014 Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ralph L. Hayes, Appellant Pro Se. Phillip Verne Anderson, John Chadwick Johnson, FRITH, ANDERSON & PEAKE, PC, Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In this Title VII action alleging racial discrimination, Ralph L. Hayes appeals the district court’s order granting Lynchburg City School Board’s motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Hayes’ motion for the appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hayes v. Lynchburg City Sch. Bd., No. 6:13-cv-00008-NKM- RSB (W.D. Va. Mar. 7, 2014). We deny as moot the School Board’s motion to quash. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer