Filed: Nov. 20, 2014
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1662 LISA BROOKS CARLSON, Debtor - Appellant, v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Creditor – Appellee, R. CLINTON STACKHOUSE, JR., Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00693-AWA-DEM) Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublish
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-1662 LISA BROOKS CARLSON, Debtor - Appellant, v. RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC, Creditor – Appellee, R. CLINTON STACKHOUSE, JR., Trustee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00693-AWA-DEM) Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014 Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. * Affirmed by unpublishe..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1662
LISA BROOKS CARLSON,
Debtor - Appellant,
v.
RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC,
Creditor – Appellee,
R. CLINTON STACKHOUSE, JR.,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Arenda L. Wright Allen,
District Judge. (2:13-cv-00693-AWA-DEM)
Submitted: November 18, 2014 Decided: November 20, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. *
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
*
The opinion is filed by a quorum of the panel pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 46(d) (2006).
Lisa Brooks Carlson, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald James Guillot,
Jr., SAMUEL I. WHITE, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Lisa Carlson appeals from the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order granting relief from the
automatic stay. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Carlson v. Rushmore Loan Mgmt.
Servs., LLC, No. 2:13-cv-00693-AWA-DEM (E.D. Va. June 4, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3