WHITAKER v. NASH-ROCKY MOUNT BOARD OF EDUCATION, 14-1620. (2014)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20141023236
Visitors: 19
Filed: Oct. 23, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 23, 2014
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No. 5:14-cv-00041-BO (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument bec
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM. Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No. 5:14-cv-00041-BO (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument beca..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
Walter Lee Whitaker appeals the district court's order denying his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing his complaint for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Whitaker v. Nash-Rocky Mount Bd. of Educ., No. 5:14-cv-00041-BO (E.D.N.C. June 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
