Filed: Feb. 19, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7623 MINYARD CASS DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVE SIMONS; WILLIE BHAGIRATH; D. V. PERRY; R. WHITEHEAD; LIEUTENANT ELLIS; TAMARA EVERETTE; A. CASPER; JEFFREY MILTON; L. SUTTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00522-RAJ-LRL) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015 Before MOT
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 14-7623 MINYARD CASS DAVIS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DAVE SIMONS; WILLIE BHAGIRATH; D. V. PERRY; R. WHITEHEAD; LIEUTENANT ELLIS; TAMARA EVERETTE; A. CASPER; JEFFREY MILTON; L. SUTTON, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (2:13-cv-00522-RAJ-LRL) Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015 Before MOTZ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7623
MINYARD CASS DAVIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAVE SIMONS; WILLIE BHAGIRATH; D. V. PERRY; R. WHITEHEAD;
LIEUTENANT ELLIS; TAMARA EVERETTE; A. CASPER; JEFFREY
MILTON; L. SUTTON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00522-RAJ-LRL)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 19, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Minyard Cass Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ehrich, Anne
Catherine Lahren, Jeff W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia
Beach, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Minyard Cass Davis appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Davis v. Simons, No. 2:13-cv-00522-RAJ-LRL (E.D. Va.
Sept. 30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2