Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Pendergrass v. Sullivan, 15-1167 (2015)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 15-1167 Visitors: 84
Filed: Jun. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1167 JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent, Plaintiff, v. DONALD SULLIVAN, a/k/a James D. Sullivan, Defendant – Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00287-FL) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1167 JAMES K. PENDERGRASS, JR., Escrow Agent, Plaintiff, v. DONALD SULLIVAN, a/k/a James D. Sullivan, Defendant – Appellant, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant – Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan, District Judge. (5:14-cv-00287-FL) Submitted: June 25, 2015 Decided: June 29, 2015 Before GREGORY, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Donald Sullivan, Appellant Pro Se. Michael J. Haungs, Supervisory Attorney, Robert Joel Branman, Lee Perla, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Donald Sullivan appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the United States in an interpleader action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Pendergrass v. Sullivan, No. 5:14-cv-00287-FL (E.D.N.C. Jan. 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer