Filed: Oct. 04, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2293 KENNETH MEREDITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RUSSELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, d/b/a Russell County Public Schools, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00084-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: September 12, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpu
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-2293 KENNETH MEREDITH, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RUSSELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, d/b/a Russell County Public Schools, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00084-JPJ-PMS) Submitted: September 12, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpub..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-2293
KENNETH MEREDITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RUSSELL COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD, d/b/a Russell County Public
Schools,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Abingdon. James P. Jones, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00084-JPJ-PMS)
Submitted: September 12, 2016 Decided: October 4, 2016
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and TRAXLER and KING, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard F. Hawkins, III, HAWKINS LAW FIRM, PC, Richmond,
Virginia, for Appellant. M. Katherine Patton, CHAFIN LAW FIRM
PC, Lebanon, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth Meredith appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to Defendant in Meredith’s 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) civil rights action in which Meredith asserted a
First Amendment retaliation claim. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Meredith v. Russell
Cty. Sch. Bd., No. 1:13-cv-00084-JPJ-PMS (W.D. Va. Sept. 21,
2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2