Filed: Feb. 25, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7294 MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ERIC L. REID, Plaintiff, v. CHAPLAIN JACKSON, Defendant – Appellee, and EDDIE PEARSON, individually and official capacity; R. WALLACE, individually and official capacity; WENDY S. HOBBS, individually and official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00339
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-7294 MALCOLM MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff – Appellant, and ERIC L. REID, Plaintiff, v. CHAPLAIN JACKSON, Defendant – Appellee, and EDDIE PEARSON, individually and official capacity; R. WALLACE, individually and official capacity; WENDY S. HOBBS, individually and official capacity, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District Judge. (1:13-cv-00339-..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-7294
MALCOLM MUHAMMAD,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
ERIC L. REID,
Plaintiff,
v.
CHAPLAIN JACKSON,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
EDDIE PEARSON, individually and official capacity; R.
WALLACE, individually and official capacity; WENDY S.
HOBBS, individually and official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Liam O’Grady, District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00339-LO-TCB)
Submitted: February 23, 2016 Decided: February 25, 2016
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Malcolm Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson,
Assistant Attorney General, Richard Carson Vorhis, Senior
Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Malcolm Muhammad appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Muhammad v. Reid, No. 1:13-cv-00339-LO-TCB (E.D. Va.
Apr. 24 & July 31, 2013; Aug. 22, 2014; June 30, 2015). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3