Filed: Jul. 22, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6366 CHASTIS NIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN DOE, Superintendent of Salisbury Correctional Institution; JOHN DOE, II, Superintendent of Alexander Correctional Institution; GASTON COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; GASTON COUNTY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00370-FDW) Submitted: Jul
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-6366 CHASTIS NIXON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN DOE, Superintendent of Salisbury Correctional Institution; JOHN DOE, II, Superintendent of Alexander Correctional Institution; GASTON COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; GASTON COUNTY JAIL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00370-FDW) Submitted: July..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-6366
CHASTIS NIXON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN DOE, Superintendent of Salisbury Correctional
Institution; JOHN DOE, II, Superintendent of Alexander
Correctional Institution; GASTON COUNTY MUNICIPALITY; GASTON
COUNTY JAIL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief
District Judge. (3:15-cv-00370-FDW)
Submitted: July 21, 2016 Decided: July 22, 2016
Before SHEDD, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Chastis Ray Gomez Nixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Chastis Nixon seeks to appeal the district court’s orders
granting his motion to amend his complaint and dismissing without
prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action for failure to comply
with the court’s order to file an amended complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Nixon v.
Doe, No. 3:15-cv-00370-FDW (W.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2016; May 5, 2016).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2