McDOWELL v. MITCHELL-HAMILTON, 15-7357. (2016)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20160120126
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 20, 2016
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . James Stephon McDowell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton , No. 9:14-cv-02132-BHH (D.S.C. July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral
Summary: UNPUBLISHED Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM . James Stephon McDowell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton , No. 9:14-cv-02132-BHH (D.S.C. July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral a..
More
UNPUBLISHED
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM.
James Stephon McDowell appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See McDowell v. Mitchell-Hamilton, No. 9:14-cv-02132-BHH (D.S.C. July 20, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
