Filed: Jun. 07, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1586 AMNAH QAISER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; LINDA MCMAHON; VANESSA PICCIONI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN) Submitted: May 24, 2017 Decided: June 7, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam o
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-1586 AMNAH QAISER, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; LINDA MCMAHON; VANESSA PICCIONI, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN) Submitted: May 24, 2017 Decided: June 7, 2017 Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam op..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-1586
AMNAH QAISER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION; LINDA MCMAHON; VANESSA
PICCIONI,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN)
Submitted: May 24, 2017 Decided: June 7, 2017
Before KING, AGEE, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charity Chidinma Emeronye Swift, Stephen Christopher Swift, SWIFT & SWIFT,
ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PLLC, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Dana J. Boente,
United States Attorney, Andrew S. Han, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Amnah Qaiser appeals the district court’s order denying her motion for leave to
amend her complaint and granting Defendants summary judgment on Qaiser’s
discrimination and hostile work environment harassment claims, brought pursuant to
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
(2012). We have reviewed the record and have considered the parties’ arguments and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Quaiser v. SBA, No. 1:15-cv-01627-JCC-MSN (E.D. Va. filed Mar. 18, 2016
& entered Mar. 21, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2