Filed: Apr. 27, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7650 LARRY BRANDON MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, individually and in his official capacity; GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of N.C.D.P.S., D.A.C., individually and in their official capacity; PECK TAYLOR, Assistant Superintendent of Custody and Operations and Acting Superintendent at A.M.C.I., individually and in their official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the Uni
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 16-7650 LARRY BRANDON MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, individually and in his official capacity; GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of N.C.D.P.S., D.A.C., individually and in their official capacity; PECK TAYLOR, Assistant Superintendent of Custody and Operations and Acting Superintendent at A.M.C.I., individually and in their official capacity, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the Unit..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7650
LARRY BRANDON MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RANDY S. MULL, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, individually and in his official
capacity; GEORGE T. SOLOMON, Director of N.C.D.P.S., D.A.C., individually
and in their official capacity; PECK TAYLOR, Assistant Superintendent of
Custody and Operations and Acting Superintendent at A.M.C.I., individually and in
their official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:16-cv-00249-FDW)
Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: April 27, 2017
Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Larry Brandon Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Larry Brandon Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Moore’s motion to appoint
counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Mull, No. 1:16-
cv-00249-FDW (W.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2