Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re: John Francis Curran, III, 17-1872 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 17-1872 Visitors: 32
Filed: Nov. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1872 In re: JOHN FRANCIS CURRAN, III, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-ct-03034-FL) Submitted: November 1, 2017 Decided: November 8, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John F. Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Francis Curran, III, petitions for a writ of manda
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1872 In re: JOHN FRANCIS CURRAN, III, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:17-ct-03034-FL) Submitted: November 1, 2017 Decided: November 8, 2017 Before MOTZ, KING, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. John F. Curran, III, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John Francis Curran, III, petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his civil action. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer