Filed: Dec. 21, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1882 OWEN RANDOLF FLIPPINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US HOME MORTGAGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-04021-TDC) Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 21, 2017 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owen Randolf Flippings, Appellant Pro Se.
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1882 OWEN RANDOLF FLIPPINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US HOME MORTGAGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-04021-TDC) Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 21, 2017 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owen Randolf Flippings, Appellant Pro Se. ..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-1882 OWEN RANDOLF FLIPPINGS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. US HOME MORTGAGE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:15-cv-04021-TDC) Submitted: December 19, 2017 Decided: December 21, 2017 Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Owen Randolf Flippings, Appellant Pro Se. David Edmund Worthen, QUARLES & BRADY LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Owen Randolf Flippings appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his civil complaint and denying reconsideration of that decision. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Flippings v. US Home Mortg., No. 8:15-cv-04021-TDC (D. Md. May 2, 2017 & July 17, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
