Filed: Aug. 29, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6707 ROBERT GARY MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. JOHNSON, Notary; DIVISION OF CORRECTION COMMISSIONER, Name Unknown; BISHOP, Warden of N.B.C.I.; STATE OF MARYLAND US FEDERAL CO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01188-JKB) Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judg
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-6707 ROBERT GARY MOORE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MS. JOHNSON, Notary; DIVISION OF CORRECTION COMMISSIONER, Name Unknown; BISHOP, Warden of N.B.C.I.; STATE OF MARYLAND US FEDERAL CO, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01188-JKB) Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017 Before GREGORY, Chief Judge..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-6707
ROBERT GARY MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. JOHNSON, Notary; DIVISION OF CORRECTION COMMISSIONER,
Name Unknown; BISHOP, Warden of N.B.C.I.; STATE OF MARYLAND US
FEDERAL CO,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01188-JKB)
Submitted: August 24, 2017 Decided: August 29, 2017
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and SHEDD and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert G. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Robert Gary Moore appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failing to state a claim. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. Moore v. Johnson, No. 1:17-cv-01188-JKB (D. Md. May 3, 2017).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2