Filed: Jun. 15, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2442 JOHN S. SAMUELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRAVIS L. NUTTER, Lieutenant for the Caroline County Sheriff’s Office, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00665-REP) Submitted: June 7, 2018 Decided: June 15, 2018 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judg
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2442 JOHN S. SAMUELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRAVIS L. NUTTER, Lieutenant for the Caroline County Sheriff’s Office, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00665-REP) Submitted: June 7, 2018 Decided: June 15, 2018 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judge..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2442 JOHN S. SAMUELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. TRAVIS L. NUTTER, Lieutenant for the Caroline County Sheriff’s Office, in his Individual and Official Capacity, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:15-cv-00665-REP) Submitted: June 7, 2018 Decided: June 15, 2018 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. John S. Samuels, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander Francuzenko, COOK CRAIG & FRANCUZENKO, PLLC, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: John S. Samuels appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to vacate the parties’ settlement agreement and release, and dismissing his civil action with prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Samuels v. Nutter, No. 3:15-cv-00665-REP (E.D. Va. Nov. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
