Filed: Jul. 23, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1343 WINFRED F. NICHOLSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 016609-17) Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Campbell Rennie, Rachel Ida Wollitzer, Tax Division, UNITED S
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1343 WINFRED F. NICHOLSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 016609-17) Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Campbell Rennie, Rachel Ida Wollitzer, Tax Division, UNITED ST..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1343 WINFRED F. NICHOLSON, Petitioner - Appellant, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 016609-17) Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Winfred F. Nicholson, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Campbell Rennie, Rachel Ida Wollitzer, Tax Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Winfred F. Nicholson appeals from the tax court’s order dismissing his petition in which he sought to challenge a notice of deficiency regarding his 2012 federal income tax liability and a tax refund for the 2016 tax year. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Nicholson v. Comm’r of Internal Rev., Tax Ct. No. 016609-17 (U.S. Tax Ct. Mar. 5, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
