Filed: Jan. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2017 BOBBY ROBBINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DSS; TINA KINSLER; JHANTE ROBBINS; SCHOOL BOARD; RICHLAND COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; MENTAL HEALTH; MAIN STREET 1701; MS. FOSTER; MS. JETER; SONYA GOOD; KENDRA MARTIN; LADAWN, Defendant - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-01973-CMC) Submitted: January 17,
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2017 BOBBY ROBBINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. DSS; TINA KINSLER; JHANTE ROBBINS; SCHOOL BOARD; RICHLAND COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; MENTAL HEALTH; MAIN STREET 1701; MS. FOSTER; MS. JETER; SONYA GOOD; KENDRA MARTIN; LADAWN, Defendant - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-01973-CMC) Submitted: January 17, ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2017
BOBBY ROBBINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DSS; TINA KINSLER; JHANTE ROBBINS; SCHOOL BOARD; RICHLAND
COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT; MENTAL HEALTH; MAIN STREET 1701;
MS. FOSTER; MS. JETER; SONYA GOOD; KENDRA MARTIN; LADAWN,
Defendant - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at
Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-01973-CMC)
Submitted: January 17, 2019 Decided: January 22, 2019
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bobby Robbins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Bobby Robbins appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of
the magistrate judge and dismissing this civil action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robbins v. DSS, No. 3:18-cv-01973-
CMC (D.S.C. Aug. 14, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument
would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2