Filed: Jun. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2458 SHAWN L. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; GREENBELT POLICE DEPT., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:18-cv-01011-DKC) Submitted: June 6, 2019 Decided: June 27, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-2458 SHAWN L. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STATE OF MARYLAND; GREENBELT POLICE DEPT., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:18-cv-01011-DKC) Submitted: June 6, 2019 Decided: June 27, 2019 Before NIEMEYER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-2458
SHAWN L. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; GREENBELT POLICE DEPT.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District Judge. (8:18-cv-01011-DKC)
Submitted: June 6, 2019 Decided: June 27, 2019
Before NIEMEYER and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shawn L. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Shawn L. Armstrong seeks to appeal the district court’s order granting additional
time to file a supplemental complaint. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over
final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337
U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Armstrong seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor
an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2