Filed: Feb. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7221 CHRISTOPHER LEE MICHELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN COON, Asheville Police Dept. Detective; MIKE LAMB, Asheville Police Dept. Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees, and MARK S. GAGE, ATF Agent; RON MOORE, Buncombe County District Attorney; ROGER THEODORE SMITH, Buncombe County Attorney at Law; VAN DUNCAN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Ashevil
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7221 CHRISTOPHER LEE MICHELSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. STEPHEN COON, Asheville Police Dept. Detective; MIKE LAMB, Asheville Police Dept. Sergeant, Defendants - Appellees, and MARK S. GAGE, ATF Agent; RON MOORE, Buncombe County District Attorney; ROGER THEODORE SMITH, Buncombe County Attorney at Law; VAN DUNCAN, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Ashevill..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7221
CHRISTOPHER LEE MICHELSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STEPHEN COON, Asheville Police Dept. Detective; MIKE LAMB, Asheville
Police Dept. Sergeant,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
MARK S. GAGE, ATF Agent; RON MOORE, Buncombe County District
Attorney; ROGER THEODORE SMITH, Buncombe County Attorney at Law;
VAN DUNCAN,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina,
at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (1:17-cv-00050-FDW)
Submitted: February 21, 2019 Decided: February 26, 2019
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and AGEE and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Lee Michelson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Lee Michelson appeals the district court’s order dismissing his claims
against one but not all defendants, and denying various motions. This court may exercise
jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and
collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial
Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Michelson seeks to appeal is
neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
3