Filed: Apr. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7327 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00058-NCT-1) Submitted: March 15, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony W
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-7327 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00058-NCT-1) Submitted: March 15, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Anthony Wa..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-7327
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANTHONY WAYNE MANGUM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at
Greensboro. N. Carlton Tilley, Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:06-cr-00058-NCT-1)
Submitted: March 15, 2019 Decided: April 3, 2019
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Wayne Mangum, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Wayne Mangum appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Mangum, No. 1:06-cr-00058-NCT-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 11, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2