Filed: Aug. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1436 MICHAEL D. WEBB, a/k/a Major Mike Webb, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00257-CMH-TCB) Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019 Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1436 MICHAEL D. WEBB, a/k/a Major Mike Webb, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00257-CMH-TCB) Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019 Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1436 MICHAEL D. WEBB, a/k/a Major Mike Webb, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. U.S. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00257-CMH-TCB) Submitted: August 20, 2019 Decided: August 22, 2019 Before FLOYD and RUSHING, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael David Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Michael D. Webb appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for temporary injunctive relief and motion to reconsider. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Webb v. U.S. Merit Sys. Prot. Bd., No. 1:19-cv-00257-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2019 & Apr. 5, 2019). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
