Filed: Dec. 23, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1893 PATRICK O. LOCKHART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THEODORE J. MARKOW, Individually and officially as substitute of Judge of Fairfax Circuit Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00714-TSE-IDD) Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-1893 PATRICK O. LOCKHART, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THEODORE J. MARKOW, Individually and officially as substitute of Judge of Fairfax Circuit Court, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00714-TSE-IDD) Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM,..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-1893
PATRICK O. LOCKHART,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THEODORE J. MARKOW, Individually and officially as substitute of Judge of
Fairfax Circuit Court,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. T.S. Ellis, III, Senior District Judge. (1:19-cv-00714-TSE-IDD)
Submitted: December 19, 2019 Decided: December 23, 2019
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and QUATTLEBAUM, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patrick O. Lockhart, Appellant Pro Se. Calvin Cameron Brown, Assistant Attorney
General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Patrick O. Lockhart appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice
Lockhart’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) civil rights action. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
See Lockhart v. Markow, No. 1:19-cv-00714-TSE-IDD (E.D. Va. filed July 18, 2019 &
entered July 19, 2019). We deny Lockhart’s motion for the appointment of counsel. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2