Filed: Sep. 27, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6346 MICHAEL HENRY SHAHAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J. RAY ORMOND, Warden for FCC Petersburg, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00200-HEH-RCY) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unp
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6346 MICHAEL HENRY SHAHAN, Petitioner - Appellant, v. J. RAY ORMOND, Warden for FCC Petersburg, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00200-HEH-RCY) Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019 Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpu..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6346
MICHAEL HENRY SHAHAN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
J. RAY ORMOND, Warden for FCC Petersburg,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, Senior District Judge. (3:18-cv-00200-HEH-RCY)
Submitted: September 24, 2019 Decided: September 27, 2019
Before WYNN and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Henry Shahan, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Michael Henry Shahan, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting
Respondent’s motion for summary judgment and denying relief on Shahan’s 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny Shahan’s motion to appoint
counsel, and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Shahan v. Ormond,
No. 3:18-cv-00200-HEH-RCY (E.D. Va. Dec. 19, 2018). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2