Filed: Jul. 19, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6632 JOHNNIE LEE JUSTICE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, etc., Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00247-LMB-TCB) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie Lee Justice, A
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6632 JOHNNIE LEE JUSTICE, Petitioner - Appellant, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, etc., Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00247-LMB-TCB) Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019 Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Johnnie Lee Justice, Ap..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6632
JOHNNIE LEE JUSTICE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, etc.,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at
Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:19-cv-00247-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: July 16, 2019 Decided: July 19, 2019
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Johnnie Lee Justice, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Johnnie Lee Justice appeals the district court’s order determining that his 28
U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition was an unauthorized, successive petition and dismissing
the petition without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and
affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Justice v. Clarke, No. 1:19-cv-00247-
LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. Apr. 2, 2019). We deny as unnecessary a certificate of
appealability. See Harbison v. Bell,
556 U.S. 180, 183 (2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2