Filed: Feb. 20, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6885 JOHN ERVIN WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JOHNSON, Unit Manager, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-01316-RMG) Submitted: January 17, 2020 Decided: February 20, 2020 Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 19-6885 JOHN ERVIN WILSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SERGEANT JOHNSON, Unit Manager, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-01316-RMG) Submitted: January 17, 2020 Decided: February 20, 2020 Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed as modified by unpublished per c..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-6885
JOHN ERVIN WILSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT JOHNSON, Unit Manager,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort.
Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (9:18-cv-01316-RMG)
Submitted: January 17, 2020 Decided: February 20, 2020
Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed as modified by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Ervin Wilson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
John Ervin Wilson appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge, granting Defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and
dismissing Wilson’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2018) complaint for failure to exhaust
administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court, but modify the court’s
order to reflect dismissal without prejudice. Wilson v. Johnson, No. 9:18-cv-01316-RMG
(D.S.C. June 10, 2019). We deny Wilson’s motions for appointment of counsel and
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED
2