Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Joe T. Barrera v. Roscoe, Snyder & Pacific Railway Company, 73-3731 (1974)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 73-3731 Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 08, 1974
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 503 F.2d 1058 Joe T. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROSCOE, SNYDER & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee. No. 73-3731. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Nov. 8, 1974. Aubrey L. Roberts, Jr., R. Temple Dickson, Sweetwater, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant. D. L. Case, Jack Pew, Jr., Dallas, Tex., W. James Rosser, Snyder, Tex., for defendant-appellee. Before RIVES, GEWIN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 We have given careful consideration to the contentions of the pa
More

503 F.2d 1058

Joe T. BARRERA, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
ROSCOE, SNYDER & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 73-3731.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Nov. 8, 1974.

Aubrey L. Roberts, Jr., R. Temple Dickson, Sweetwater, Tex., for plaintiff-appellant.

D. L. Case, Jack Pew, Jr., Dallas, Tex., W. James Rosser, Snyder, Tex., for defendant-appellee.

Before RIVES, GEWIN and GOLDBERG, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

We have given careful consideration to the contentions of the parties as set forth in their well-prepared briefs and further amplified at oral argument. It is our opinion that the district court arrived at the proper conclusion and that the appellant has not presented any valid basis for reversal. Accordingly, the judgment entered for appellee by the district court is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer