Filed: Dec. 20, 1978
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 586 F.2d 608 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas A. WARREN, John L. Warren, Jr., Des E. Schick and David DeFina, Defendants-Appellants. No. 75-4368. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1978. Michael S. Tarre, Miami, Fla., for Warren. Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for J. Warren. Sky E. Smith, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for DeFina. Alan M. Medof, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Schick. Stewart E. Parsons, Florida State Hospital, Ch
Summary: 586 F.2d 608 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas A. WARREN, John L. Warren, Jr., Des E. Schick and David DeFina, Defendants-Appellants. No. 75-4368. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Dec. 20, 1978. Michael S. Tarre, Miami, Fla., for Warren. Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for J. Warren. Sky E. Smith, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for DeFina. Alan M. Medof, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Schick. Stewart E. Parsons, Florida State Hospital, Cha..
More
586 F.2d 608
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Thomas A. WARREN, John L. Warren, Jr., Des E. Schick and
David DeFina, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 75-4368.
United States Court of Appeals,
Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 20, 1978.
Michael S. Tarre, Miami, Fla., for Warren.
Daniel S. Pearson, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for J. Warren.
Sky E. Smith, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for DeFina.
Alan M. Medof, Miami, Fla. (Court-appointed), for Schick.
Stewart E. Parsons, Florida State Hospital, Chattahoochee, Fla. (Court-appointed), for T. Warren.
Jack V. Eskenazi, U.S. Atty., Jamie L. Whitten, Asst. U.S. Atty., Miami, Fla., Shirley Baccus-Lobel, Asst. U.S. Atty., Dallas, Tex. (on rehearing), Lewis M. Fischer, Atty., App. Section, Crim. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for plaintiff-appellee.
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, AINSWORTH, GODBOLD, CLARK, RONEY, GEE, TJOFLAT, HILL and FAY, Circuit Judges.BY THE COURT:
1
IT IS ORDERED by the Court that the appellants' petition for rehearing of this case is DENIED as to all issues except the propriety of the application of the concurrent sentence doctrine. See United States v. Warren, 578 F.2d 1058, 1077 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc). The Court reserves disposition of the petition for rehearing on the concurrent sentence issue.
