Filed: Mar. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10251 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEANENE PORTER TRICKETT, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-113-A/4:93-CR-136-3 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jeanene Porter Trickett argues that the district court e
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 95-10251 Conference Calendar _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JEANENE PORTER TRICKETT, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CV-113-A/4:93-CR-136-3 - - - - - - - - - - February 29, 1996 Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jeanene Porter Trickett argues that the district court er..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 95-10251
Conference Calendar
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JEANENE PORTER TRICKETT,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:95-CV-113-A/4:93-CR-136-3
- - - - - - - - - -
February 29, 1996
Before GARWOOD, JONES, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jeanene Porter Trickett argues that the district court erred
by construing her motion to set aside the judgment in her
criminal case as sounding under 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 and that the
indictment to which she pleaded guilty did not charge the
conspiracy for which she was sentenced. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and conclude that the
appeal is frivolous. See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20
(5th Cir. 1983); 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-10251
-2-
We caution Trickett that any additional frivolous appeals
filed by her will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid
sanctions, Trickett is further cautioned to review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED.