Filed: Jul. 09, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-30886 Conference Calendar RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DELOS JOHNSON; RICHARD WATTS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-2037 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 95-30886 Conference Calendar RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DELOS JOHNSON; RICHARD WATTS, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-2037 - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its own motion i..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-30886
Conference Calendar
RUCHELL CINQUE MAGEE,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
DELOS JOHNSON; RICHARD WATTS,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Louisiana
USDC No. 95-CV-2037
- - - - - - - - - -
June 27, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
This court must examine the basis of its jurisdiction on its
own motion if necessary. Mosley v. Cozby,
813 F.2d 659, 660 (5th
Cir. 1987). The district court entered final judgment dismissing
this action on August 11, 1995. On August 28, 1995, Magee filed
in the district court a “Motion to Reconsider Order or in the
Alternative, Motion for Leave to Take an Interlocutory Appeal In
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 95-30886
- 2 -
Forma Pauperis.” Because the pleading requests reconsideration
of the district court’s final judgment as the primary relief and
requests leave to appeal only in the alternative, the document
does not clearly evince an intent to appeal from the August 11,
1995, judgment. See
id. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED.
APPEAL DISMISSED.