Filed: Oct. 20, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11351 Conference Calendar FRANCISCO ROSA GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-2969-D - October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Francisco Rosa Gonzalez, federal prisoner no. 21059-077, has appealed the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C.
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-11351 Conference Calendar FRANCISCO ROSA GONZALEZ, Petitioner-Appellant, versus UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:97-CV-2969-D - October 19, 1999 Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Francisco Rosa Gonzalez, federal prisoner no. 21059-077, has appealed the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. §..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-11351
Conference Calendar
FRANCISCO ROSA GONZALEZ,
Petitioner-Appellant,
versus
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:97-CV-2969-D
--------------------
October 19, 1999
Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Francisco Rosa Gonzalez, federal prisoner no. 21059-077, has
appealed the district court’s dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
petition. Gonzalez is currently serving concurrent state and
federal sentences. He contends that he is entitled to a credit
on his federal sentence for time served on his state sentence
prior to his sentencing on the federal charges. As Gonzalez does
not dispute that he has received credit on his state sentence for
the period in question, he is not entitled to credit on his
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 98-11351
-2-
federal sentence for this period. See 18 U.S.C. § 3585(b);
United States v. Flores,
616 F.2d 840, 841 (5th Cir. 1980).
As Gonzalez has failed to raise an issue of arguable merit
in his appeal, it is frivolous. We therefore dismiss the appeal.
See Howard v. King,
707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5th
Cir. Rule 42.2. Gonzalez is warned that future frivolous appeals
may result in the imposition of sanctions.
APPEAL DISMISSED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.