Filed: Jun. 08, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40701 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VICTOR HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-145-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 2, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hernandez-Hernandez (Hern
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-40701 Summary Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus VICTOR HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-98-CR-145-1 - - - - - - - - - - June 2, 1999 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor Hernandez-Hernandez (Herna..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-40701
Summary Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
VICTOR HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-98-CR-145-1
- - - - - - - - - -
June 2, 1999
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, JONES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Victor
Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernandez) has moved for leave to withdraw
and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386
U.S. 738 (1967). Hernandez was sent a copy of counsel’s motion
and brief, but has not filed a response. Our independent review
of the brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue for
appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein,
and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.